Cem Ilkel vs Yanaki Milev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ilkel vs Y. Milev

Cem Ilkel
TUR
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
21
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
580
C. Rank
712
144
Best Rank
443
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$225.5K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Yanaki Milev
BUL
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
21
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
580
C. Rank
712
144
Best Rank
443
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$225.5K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Milev
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 2 and Yanaki Milev winning 0. The last match between Cem Ilkel and Yanaki Milev was at the M15 Doha, 17-01-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ilkel | 1 |
| Milev | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Doha(01-17-25)
Cem Ilkel
6
7
Yanaki Milev
3
6
C. Ilkel vs Y. Milev H2H Profile
C. Ilkel vs Y. Milev Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cem Ilkel has won 58.57% of points on their second serve, while Yanaki Milev has won 45.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cem Ilkel, in recent form, has won 49.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Yanaki Milev has won 47.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 19.62% and 32.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cem Ilkel has saved 63.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Yanaki Milev has saved 53.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cem Ilkel has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 30/12), with Yanaki Milev winning 50.00% (W/L 30/30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9). Yanaki Milev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 117/88), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/3).
- Player level: In the last year, Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9), where as Yanaki Milev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.06% of matches (W/L 24/23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cem Ilkel winning 1 times and Yanaki Milev being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 2 and Yanaki Milev winning 0.
- The last match between Cem Ilkel and Yanaki Milev was at the M15 Doha, 17-01-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:44.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cem Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 423.45 while Yanaki Milev has played against players with an average rank of 395.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cem Ilkel has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Yanaki Milev has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cem Ilkel has converted 11.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Yanaki Milev has converted 39.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cem Ilkel vs Yanaki Milev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Ilkel vs Y. Milev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:31:44 | Average Match Time | 1:31:44 |
| 58% (39/67) | 1st Serve % | 67% (40/60) |
| 79% (31/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (29/40) |
| 64% (18/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (12/20) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 32% (19/60) | Return Points Win % | 27% (18/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Ilkel 58%, Milev 48%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Ilkel 52%, Milev 50%.
Break Points Saved %: Ilkel 61%, Milev 56%.
C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
SF | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Y. Milev Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 7-6(4) | ||
Q2 | W | 7-5 7-6(5) | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | ||

C. Ilkel vs Y. Milev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.52% (438/337) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.00% (126/99) |
| 54.63% (979/813) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.55% (288/240) |
| 51.54% (8791/8267) | Games Win/Loss | 51.17% (2584/2466) |
| 61.41% (288/181) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 44.53% (57/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.07% (117/88) |
| 54.76% (92/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 10.00% (1/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 2865 | Aces Total | 522 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 1385 | Total Double Faults | 881 |
| 1:15:9 | Average Match Time | 1:40:12 |
| 560.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 439.8 |
| 58% (24152/41308) | 1st Serve % | 57% (8550/15029) |
| 70% (16999/24152) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (5675/8550) |
| 51% (8757/17156) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3062/6479) |
| 40% (1622/4023) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (733/1631) |
| 39% (16247/41803) | Return Points Win % | 42% (6269/14906) |
| 31.82% (7/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 31.82% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 17.86% (5/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 52.23% (176/161) | Challenger W/L | 37.84% (14/23) |
| 66.39% (241/122) | Futures W/L | 60.44% (110/72) |
| 56% (426/756) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (124/223) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 53% (147/275) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (39/62) |
| 56% (130/233) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (41/78) |
| 85% (424/362) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (122/104) |
| 14% (424/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (122/18) |
| 21% (350/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (103/22) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:50 PM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction07:10 PM 16/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction07:05 PM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
16 Nov 2025
Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
20:00
H2H 10-5
18:45
H2H 1-0
17:05
H2H 0-0
18:20
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal